Prop 13/AB 8/Gann Limit

Brief history

Nearly forty years ago, on June 6, 1978, roughly two-thirds of California ‘s voters passed Proposition 13, to reduce property taxes by almost 57%.  Based on this newly amended state constitution, property tax rates could not exceed 1% of the property’s market value, and re-evaluations of properties could not exceed 2% per annum unless the property was sold (HJTA, 2018).

Before Proposition 13, the tax rate throughout California was approximately 3% of the market value, and there were no limits placed on the increases to tax rates or property value assessments (HTJA, 2018).  Due to Proposition 13, new home buyers could now be aware of what their property taxes would be and know the maximum amount they may increase, per year if he or she owns the property.  Also, Proposition 13 enforced all state tax rate increases be approved by two-thirds vote of the legislature and that local tax rates be approved by a vote of the people (HJTA,2018).  Solidifying the idea that, taxpayer protection is predicated on the people’s right to vote.

prop_13_sc102

Paul Gann and Howard Jarvis hold up their hands in victory after Prop 13 passed in California in 1978. 

Proposition 13: the Basics in 2 Minutes

Impact on Financing California Education

After the passage of Proposition 13, educational finance was re-vamped, with school districts receiving a portion of the property tax (through the AB 8 allocation formula) and direct payments from the state (Chapman, 1998, pg. 16).  This had an impact on public education in California because school districts no longer depend on property tax to fund schools and instead rely heavily on state revenue.  Nearly 100% of funding is covered through state aid (Concordia, 2018).  Since 1978, school funding in California has gone from being one of the highest in the nation to one of the lowest.  (HJTA, 2018).  What that looks like in real time is our class sizes are amongst the largest anywhere, many extra-curriculum programs like music or electives have been cut or removed from schools entirely, and school funding per-pupil is relatively low compared to other states.

Prop 13’s Impact On Schools

Prop-13_01cartoon

References

Chapman, J. I. (1998). Proposition 13: Some unintended consequences. Public Policy Institute of California.

Concordia University Irvine Online (2018).  California’s Fiscal History in Education: Adequacy v.s. Equality: Video Module.  Retrieved from http://resources.cui.edu/courses/edua558/modules/2/player.html

HJTA (2018). Proposition 13: A look back. Retrieved from https://www.hjta.org/propositions/proposition-13/proposition-13-look-back/

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s